"working in the dark but expected to be an expert": Reflecting on critical care preparations for COVID-19

Introduction: Before spring 2020, many healthcare organisations did not possess detailed plans for the expansion and delivery of critical care during a pandemic. Furthermore, there was little directly-relevant individual or institutional experience to draw upon. Local, national and international guidance was drawn up rapidly and subject to frequent revision.1 Reflecting on these challenges, we designed a study to explore critical care and anaesthetic doctors' experiences of preparation for the provision of critical care services in the first wave of COVID-19. Objective(s): 1. To establish what factors facilitated and hindered the expansion and delivery of critical care services. 2. To identify important learning points for the provision of critical care during future pandemics. Method(s): We conducted semi-structured interviews with medical staff from the anaesthesia and critical care departments of our hospital, a tertiary centre with general and cardiothoracic intensive care units, including an ECMO service. We classified participants into two groups;1. Decision makers - individuals instrumental in shaping the critical care response, e.g., clinical directors and college tutors. 2. Staff members - clinicians working within the departments, including consultants and trainees. Thirteen interviews were conducted with 15 participants: eight decision makers and seven staff members. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and anonymised. We manually coded transcripts, and carried out an inductive thematic analysis.2 Results: Eight themes were generated from our analysis: * Problem solving with simulation: simulation exercises allowed experienced clinicians to troubleshoot practical issues and helped staff to prepare for unfamiliar tasks. * A sense of togetherness: staff reported that the "all hands-on deck" ethos was protective against fatigue, although this was short-lived. * Delayed and changing guidance: frequent guideline changes created confusion and anxiety. * Leading from the front: leaders with a clinical role were perceived more positively than those operating at a distance from the "shop-floor". * Coordination, collaboration and compromise: departments that accommodated each other's needs fostered productive inter-departmental relationships. * Insecure supply chains: staff took their own measures to ensure PPE availability, including acquisition of items outside NHS supply chains. * Constant communication: rapid methods of personal communication, e.g., WhatsApp were effective, although "WhatsApp fatigue" was endemic. * Balancing skill mix and fatigue: flux in workload required dynamic staff allocation. Underutilised staff groups created frustration and low morale in overworked colleagues. Conclusion(s): The threat to health and society from pandemic events is expected to increase over time.3 We should take this opportunity to gather experiences from those involved in the COVID-19 pandemic to guide future preparations. In early 2020, decision makes in local hospitals were operating with unclear guidance from external agencies. Our data, obtained in the summer of 2021 demonstrates that individual and departmental reflections had already resulted in processes being refined in later waves of COVID-19. Whilst the exact nature of future pandemics will vary, some elements of preparation will remain consistent. We recommend that plans for pandemic management should aim to reduce workload and target the most effective interventions, including by addressing the themes outlined above.

Patients as partners in readiness for COVID-19: using 'live simulation' to implement infection prevention and control procedures in the maternity operating theatre.

Insitu simulation can be used to improve care within a particular setting and has specific value in developing and testing guidelines and procedures. However, it can be challenging to undertake simulation when clinical work is ongoing. Responding to the need to develop infection prevention and control procedures for coronavirus disease 2019 in the obstetric operating theatre, we asked three patients who required operative intervention to consent to be managed according to preliminary standard operating procedures as if they were severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 positive. With this method, we were able to run scenarios in real-time without interrupting clinical work. As well as allowing us to develop and refine procedures, these 'live simulations' provided staff training and highlighted system problems that needed to be addressed as the first wave of the pandemic approached. In this case series, we describe our procedure for live simulation, report the learning points that this approach yielded, present the feedback from patient participants and reflect on the ethical implications of this technique.

Management of tracheostomy-related tracheomegaly in a patient with COVID-19 pneumonitis.

Acquired tracheomegaly is a rare condition associated with pulmonary fibrosis, connective tissue disease and the use of cuffed tracheal tubes. We describe the urgent tracheal re-intubation and subsequent tracheal repair of a previously well 58-year-old man who developed tracheostomy-related tracheomegaly during prolonged mechanical ventilation for coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonitis. Urgent tracheal re-intubation was required due to a persistent cuff leak, pneumomediastinum and malposition of the tracheostomy tube. We describe the additional challenges and risks associated with airway management in patients with tracheomegaly, and discuss how even in urgent cases these can be mitigated through planning and teamwork. We present a stepwise approach to tracheal re-intubation past a large tracheal dilatation, including the use of an Aintree catheter inserted via the existing tracheal stoma for oxygenation or tracheal re-intubation if required. Computed tomography imaging was valuable in characterising the defect and developing a safe airway management strategy before starting the procedure. This report emphasises the role of planning, teamwork and the development of an appropriate airway strategy in the safe management of complex cases.

The safety of paediatric surgery between COVID-19 surges: an observational study.

Despite the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective paediatric surgery must continue safely through the first, second and subsequent waves of disease. This study presents outcome data from a children's hospital in north-west England, the region with the highest prevalence of COVID-19 in England. Children and young people undergoing elective surgery isolated within their household for 14 days, then presented for real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease-2 (SARS-CoV-2) within 72 h of their procedure (or rapid testing within 24 h in high-risk cases), and completed a screening questionnaire on admission. Planned surgery resumed on 26 May 2020; in the four subsequent weeks, there were 197 patients for emergency and 501 for elective procedures. A total of 488 out of 501 (97.4%) elective admissions proceeded, representing a 2.6% COVID-19-related cancellation rate. There was no difference in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 among children and young people who had or had not isolated for 14 days (p > 0.99). One out of 685 (0.1%) children who had surgery re-presented to the hospital with symptoms potentially consistent with SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days of surgery. Outcomes were similar to those in the same time period in 2019 for length of stay (p = 1.0); unplanned critical care admissions (p = 0.59); and 14-day hospital re-admission (p = 0.17). However, the current cohort were younger (p = 0.037); of increased complexity (p < 0.001) and underwent more complex surgery (p < 0.001). The combined use of household self-isolation, testing and screening questionnaires has allowed the re-initiation of elective paediatric surgery at high volume while maintaining pre-COVID-19 outcomes in children and young people undergoing surgery. This may provide a model for addressing the ongoing challenges posed by COVID-19, as well as future pandemics.